Cause No. DV-18-101 DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT

Of particular note:

DEFENDANT’S EXHIBIT D  AFFIDAVIT OF LLOYD MACKENZIE”

DEFENDANT’S EXHIBIT E  AFFIDAVIT OF SARAH MACKENZIE”

TOWN OF FROMBERG, Plaintiff, vs. LLOYD MACKENZIE, SARAH MACKENZIE, Defendants. Said document was obtained from the Montana Twenty-Second Judicial District Court, Carbon County  and is “Public Knowledge”. tfa is free to disseminate the same. https://drive.google.com/open?id=1mopJtLW7OPsG-4rDfCa8354XEKeJoblK

4 Comments

  1. read the fine print peeps! then you’ll know the facts as opposed to what Merry Miller has said! And how about the town’s legal beagle?

  2. This is what happens when two crooks do business. Yes, I’m referring to Miller and McKenzie. It’s like which one can twist the truth the most effectively…. The unfortunate part is Miller spoon fed this back yard deal to the council. The fact that the building is near completion during the March 2018 Special Council Meeting is a lie as well. This could bring a whole host of legal issues for the town! And who ultimately pays? THE TAXPAYER!

  3. Ain’t no attorney but there’s lotsa conflictin statements bout the mckenzies and the towns depisitons here. Miller, Ventlin and Fromberg’s lawyer seem to have ran there mouth aplenty several times. Be sure n read it real clost. De guts of the case so far. Notarized statements of parties. Ifn they lie, it’s perjury. Serious sh*t here. Whosever taked k some time put these pages here. Looked legit. What’s in em is real scary. Miller just caint seem to shut up n stop trying to wear big boy pants. She should stay home on a porch wit de pups. She makt so many mistake! Them layers charge big Bucks.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *